Remnant Population / Elizabeth Moon

Cover of Remnant Population
Amazon Logo
Powells Logo

Damn, but Remnant Population was a good book. It’s a book about colonization of other planets crossed with a first contact novel. The speculative elements aren’t groundbreaking, but the story is engrossing and the main character is particularly first-rate. Ofelia Falfurrias is one of the few women of a certain age who star in science fiction, and Moon proves that such characters can be done well in such a setting.

Older, somewhere in her 70s or 80s, and a little bit dotty and cranky, Ofelia lives on a colony planet about the be evacuated after only 40 or 50 years of existence. Her son and daughter-in-law are her last remaining relatives. The rest have died along with many other colonists in the not exactly thriving outpost. The holder of the colony franchise is pulling out, and all the settlers must go. Ofelia is old and tired. She doesn’t like her son. She’s not particularly fond of having people around in general; they dismiss her as old and less than useful. So when her time comes to board the evacuation ship, she hides out in the forest figuring that the authorities won’t bother tracking down one old woman who they think will probably die anyway. And she’s correct in that assumption.

And so Ofelia begins a solitary existence. Tending her garden. Keeping up the equipment in the town. While the colony was slowly failing, there’s plenty of stores and supplies for her to keep going by herself until her death. She doesn’t get looked down on. She doesn’t have to listen to what anyone else thinks of her. She can sleep in any house that she wants. She finds it pretty freeing, although it’s pretty clear her existence is fairly mind-numbing. She mostly lives by loose routine, just enjoying her own not so grand thoughts.

The wrench that gets thrown into the works happens when the next set of colonists attempt to land. Their company decides to land in a different location on the planet, thinking the tropical location where the previous company situated Ofelia’s town was the cause of the failure. Ofelia listens to them over the radio as they land and are promptly attacked by heretofore unknown natives who slaughter the landing party. Ofelia expects both that the humans will return and that the indigenous people will find her before long. She won’t get to live out her time in blissful seclusion. And she’s irritated by that.

Psychologically speaking, I think Ofelia is rather well done. The novel rides on how interesting her character is. She moves from being slightly dotty and resentful, to happily exploring her freedom, to fear (of a sort) of the unknown aliens, to irritation with them, to some understanding. She also moves from selfishness to selflessness.

The aliens are somewhat enigmatic as characters. Some of that’s acceptable since they are, after all, alien to us. But once Moon went down the road of giving individuals personalities, I think it would have been nice to complete them a little more.

The humans who appear epitomize the Ugly American archetype, but even there they get to be condescending in different ways. I have one quibble with the scripting of the officious team leader. He goes suddenly goes beyond throwing his weight around to something beyond the pale, and it rings false. A fair amount of the focus at the end on the interaction between the planetary residents and the humans who arrive is pretty heavy-handed.

What Remnant Population does so well is combine just a little bit of old school sensawunda with an exploration of how people might actually behave in new and strange circumstances.


A few other blogged reviews:

Title: Remnant Population
Author: Elizabeth Moon
Cover creator: David Stevenson (designer)
Imprint / publisher: Del Rey / Random House
Format: Paperback
Length: 325 p.
Publication date: September 2003 (originally 1996)
ISBN-10: 0-345-46219-X

Categories: Book Reviews.

Tags: , , , , ,

Sex: A Book for Teens / Nikol Hasler

Cover of Sex: A Book for Teens
Amazon Logo
Powells Logo

Why am I reading a sex education book for teens? Two reasons: I loved the Midwest Teen Sex Show (M.T.S.S.), written by and starring Nikol Hasler, and I’ve been mentoring teens at a high school for the last five years. The Midwest Teen Sex Show was an incredibly funny and informative internet web show. They have’t had a new episode for over a year now. I believe they were attempting to make a pilot for Comedy Central. And the kids I’ve worked with have questions, lots of questions. Sex ed leaves a lot to be desired. I was hoping Sex: A Book for Teens would carry the M.T.S.S. humor over, and that it would really cover the questions teens wanted to know. And while it’s a solid book, Hasler’s writing failed to meet my expectations on both counts.

The guide is much better than anything I had when I was a teen, which was essentially nothing. I didn’t even get abstinence education. The school I went to told everyone how fertilization worked, and that was about it. I haven’t sat through any sex ed with the students I work with, so I don’t know how much better it is. But their questions are further along than mine were at that point so I expect they are getting better information than I had.

The M.T.S.S. humor is extremely zany, and often physical. They wouldn’t think twice about having a performer dress up in a giant condom. In Sex: A Book for Teens, the humor seems like the Tonight Show version, toned down and enamored of itself. About the only parts I thought really funny were the last question in the Q&A section at the end of each chapter. That question was always titled There Are No Stupid Questions—Except for This One. An example: I am really mad at my ex for breaking up with me and then still showing up whenever he wants some action. What is the best STI I can get quickly and give to him? An example of the standard humor is this advice for when folks score: It also means you can get out your foam I’m Number One! finger and wave it all around. Meh.

As for advice, it’s all good. And it goes way beyond the standard this-is-how-things-work information into stuff lots of parents and adults don’t want to talk about. It covers the topics it really should (though often times I think the focus is misplaced). It’s very accepting of homosexuality, for instance. It’s got real explanations of the risks of birth control failing. It constantly flogs Planned Parenthood as a good resource. The list of good stuff is quite lengthy.

But it leaves some pretty common issues barely touched. The section on losing one’s virginity doesn’t really answer the question How do I go about arranging it? It warns against doing it if the person isn’t ready (good). It warns of risks (good). It suggests knowing one’s body and that of the gender one wants to get busy with (good). But the guide leaves off questions like how do I bring this up with the other person?, where should we do it?, etc. One of the biggest misconceptions the kids seem to have (and I had too) was that sex wasn’t romantic if it was planned. Combine that with some taboos that say girls (and boys on occasion) aren’t proper if they seem interested in sex, and you get kids who just try to make it happen without real planning. The section on technique for straight kids mentions missionary position and suggest other positions but doesn’t name them or explain them. Nothing about using pillows to put someone in the right position, for instance. Masturbation for boys doesn’t cover cleanup.

A 181 page book can’t cover everything. It doesn’t have to cater to what I think is important. But the subjects I wrote about above, as well as others, came up over and over when I talked with students. The book answers a fair number of important questions, but leaves off a good chunk too. It’s worthwhile compared to what I had (nothing), but I don’t know how it compares to other teen sex advice books out there, since I’m not familiar with them. I really hope this is not the cream of the crop, cause it could be tons better.

Title: Sex: A Book for Teens
Author: Nikol Hasler
Imprint / publisher: Zest Books
Format: Paperback
Length: 181 p.
Publication date: May 2010
ISBN-10: 0-9819733-2-9
ISBN-13: 978-0-9819733-2-6

I received this book from the publisher through LibraryThing’s Early Reviewer program in exchange for a review to be posted on LibraryThing. In accordance with my police on review copies, I will donate $12.20 (the price of the book on Amazon.com) to the A.L.S.A.

Categories: Book Reviews.

Tags: , , ,

Asimov’s Science Fiction August 2009

Cover of Asimov's Science Fiction August 2009 (by John Jude Palencar)

Not normally someone who reads a lot of the Big 3 S.F. magazines, but the August issue last year had a story by Derek Zumsteg, a former co-worker at Expedia. I do tend to buy fiction written by people I know, so I got it in ebook format. However, it sat in my queue for a while. Now that I have the Nook, it’s more convenient to read some of my backlog.

Here’s my thoughts on the stories in the issue.

The Qualia Engine by Damien Broderick
Really smart kids kept secret, except they don’t go to Professor Xavier’s school. Broderick combines a pretty standard trope with a more philosophical rambling about what thoughts and consciousness are. I don’t like this sort of thing when it’s a thought exercise rather than the basis for a plot. And there’s not really a whole lot of plot here.
Creatures of Well-Defined Habits by Robert Reed
An interesting story. You read all the time about elderly folks who live simply but secretly have lots of money, and then they leave $1 million to a charity. Hogan in this story is sorta like that. He’s 400+ years old, one of the older humans around after genetic engineering allows people to live long lives, among other things like incorporate the D.N.A. of other animals to get their characteristics. Hogan secretly buys his local cafe so he has a place to retell his centuries worth of stories. Then he dies and an android takes his place, paid for with his estate and having his memories. The android exists just so it can retell Hogan’s stories in the cafe. Some people think it isn’t right, and do something about it. Thought this was a pretty neat take, even though I was confused as to why hate on the android, though at the end I got it.
Blue by Derek Zumsteg
Two crew people stuck together on a spaceship expedition gone wrong. Science fiction stuff pretty standard. Personality story was okay.
The Consciousness Problem by Mary Robinette Kowal
The first human clone, or at least the first one that has the memories of the original. In the tradition of scientists experimenting on themselves, the first clone is that of the scientist himself. The clone is just as smart, but as an experiment, he has to stay in the lab. Also, the scientist has issues with his wife, who’s recovering from a car accident and probably will be forever. You can sorta see where this is going. The clone doesn’t get to see the woman it loves. But it’s a scientist, so it knows it’s a bad idea. Really interesting story. Kowal takes a standard trope and fills it with really good characters instead of cookie-cutter ones. (Which is something like what she did in First Flight as well.) Might have to pick up her short story collection now, though I probably won’t go near her Jane Austen inspired Regency fantasy novel that just came out. Regency not my thing.
Two Boys by Steven Popkes
Neanderthals recreated from D.N.A. Really pretty good if you look past one weirdness. The neanderthals create for themselves a completely new culture. That’s kind of cool. But it doesn’t have a lot of reference to the existing homo sapiens culture. For instance, they create a whole new marriage and child-raising tradition out of whole cloth, where parenting roles are really different and partially communal. Particularly considering the first neanderthal in the story was raised as homo sapiens not knowing he was neanderthal for a while, it seems kind of odd that they’d successfully invent their culture that way. Regular girl satisfies her curiosity about neanderthals by going looky-looing for the house of the rumored new kid in school, a neanderthal.
Turbulence by Kristine Kathryn Rusch
Some people always get stuck next to the talkative person. The protagonist gets stuck next to the talkative person who is nervous about the flight. And every time she gets nervous, something bad happens. Dude doesn’t believe her at first. More a story about worrying than about precognition.
California Burning by Michael Blumlein
Larry’s father doesn’t want to be cremated. Dad’s dead, and the crematorium returns the bones (and the fee) to Larry because they just won’t burn. Then people show up asking Larry questions, wanting to see the remains. They kind of remind me of some of the characters in Kraken. They tell one version of who they are, then another. First the police, then the health department. It becomes increasingly apparent that Larry’s dad is far more than he seemed. I’m really not sure whether I like the story or not. It hooked me though, but that might be because of the characterization for the Larry’s dad’s weird colleagues.

Solid stories mostly, but nothing I’d nominate for awards. I think the fact that the cover image was originally intended for a Stephen King book cover and was repurposed for this issue speaks volumes about the contents.

Title: Asimov’s Science Fiction
Issue: August 2009 (#403)
Editor: Sheila Williams
Cover creator: John Jude Palencar
Publication date: June 2009

Categories: Short Fiction Reviews.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Split / Swati Avasthi

Cover of Split
Amazon Logo
Powells Logo

I call these things I write about books reviews, but for most items, these aren’t really reviews. They are chronicles of my experiences with books. Sometimes that’s more review like. Sometimes not. I never really try for objectivity. Lots of times these writings are more about me than they are the book. Sometimes the experience I have reading a book won’t be close to the experience someone else has. I am pretty sure that no one else will even come close to having the same experience I’ve had with Split, for a couple of reasons.

The first reason has to do with Deepa D. I bought Split in a charity auction for Con or Bust. I’ve mentioned them before. It’s an attempt to make a bigger science fiction bigger tent by paying the way for fans of color to attend science fiction conventions. Deepa offered a signed copy of her friend’s book, with her own post-it notes included. That’s what attracted me. I love talking books with intelligent book people (which Deepa is), and this could be a slice of book conversation.

Deepa D Post It

I wasn’t sure what to expect from her notes. It wouldn’t be like a review, written after the fact. I figured they would be more immediate and personal. And these were. Since you, dear reader, did not get these notes and will not ever get these notes, you did not read the same thing I did. They changed the experience of reading Split, and enhanced it. Deepa didn’t write anything particularly expository. Just little bits of her own personal reactions as things went along. (If it were Neil Gaiman’s Sandman, it’d be stuff like Oh Sandman, why so emo?) The effect was akin to watching a movie with a friend sitting in the next seat. I comment in their ear periodically (and they in mine). Not loudly, and not long, because no one wants to miss what’s going on next. Just little bits here and there. That’s what this was like, and it was awesome. At least it was with Deepa’s commentary. I’m only going to post her first note, because I paid well for the privilege and don’t feel like sharing.

The second reason is less exclusive, but still extremely personal. I’ve written about this elsewhere, but I know this is the first time I’ve written about it on this blog. My father died when I was just two years old, and my mother remarried a couple of years later. My step-father hit me far more than is acceptable. I won’t write more about that right now, because I’ve made peace with him. Making peace doesn’t fix things though. I was, and to this day remain, somewhat broken.

Split is about the aftermath of child abuse. I did not know this when I bought the book. I did not know this until I started reading the book. I might have left the book alone had I known. I expect fiction about child abuse to feel exploitive. Graphic descriptions trigger very emotional responses in me. I don’t want to go through that for something that exploits my experience. Split was very triggering, not just because it’s graphic, but because it’s very good. Ms. Avasthi gets it, in more ways than one.

Split opens with Jace Witherspoon showing up on his brother Christian’s doorstep in Albuquerque. Christian left home five years earlier at age 17, and Jace hasn’t heard from or seen Christian since. After Christian left, their father turned his violent attention toward 11 year old Jace. Their mother received a good share of violence too. Both boys reached a breaking point. The solution both turned to was leaving. Their mother remains living with Judge Walter Witherspoon.

Split is about what happens afterward. Much stuff I’ve seen is about what happens before. Sometimes it’s about how the cycle repeats and the abused turn into abusers. Split is different. Split is about recovery. Fucked up, messed up, painful, recovery. The people present don’t drag them down. They build them up. Jace and Christian build relationships. Split is hopeful all the way through, but not so positive as to be a sure thing. Steps forward and steps back, and I read through to the end worried that I would lose my friendships with these characters in one final giant leap backward. Either way, in Ms. Avasthi’s hands, it would have been the right ending.

Nearly every character in the book is likable but flawed. Jace and Christian are the highlights, of course. But even the secondary characters like Christian’s girlfriend Mirriam Ngu down to Jace’s soccer and romantic rival Eric were people I cared about.

A few paragraphs back I wrote that often fiction about abuse feels exploitive. There’s a few aspects to that. The most obvious is the feeling that it’s written for looky-loos, the people who slow down at an accident on the freeway to see what happened. Everyone has done something like that on occasion, including me, and some more than others. Child abuse stories go the route of voyeurism much of the time. Fine caring people can read it and think oh how horrible for those children and soothe themselves with their own caringness. One reason I don’t write much about my experience is I don’t want people tut-tut-ing over me.

A second way is when some awful stereotypes are used. I cringe whenever I read a story where an abused kid starts hurting animals and by chapter three is cackling as he uses a laptop to remotely cause a plane to crash (or similar kinds of evil-doing). Less of a caricature, but still just as cardboard, is the abused kid who grows up to abuse his own kids. That happens a lot in real life, but to be written in a non-exploitive manner requires a lot of work.

Split manages to avoid those issues very well. One of the things that is apparent very quickly is that Jace is a bastard. He can be charming as hell, but when something sets him on edge, he isn’t very nice. A good example is in his new school he goes out for the soccer team, which is pretty bad when he joins mid-season. The coach is condescending toward him, as is the team captain. Jace keeps quiet, but promptly embarrasses several teammates defending against him in scrimmage. He’s not just showing he knows his stuff; he wants to put them in their place. He knows the effect his actions have, and regrets it at times. But when irritated or angry, he does it anyway. It’s subtle characterization that makes him very believable.

Christian, like me, handles his past by not talking about it. For him, talk takes him back and he relives. He also runs. Running becomes a zen-like meditation for him, taking him to a mental space where he just is. His methods help him successfully cope, but they also have not fixed him. They are merely temporary.

I bring these two characterizations up because the brothers handle things very differently. This is key to avoiding the exploitive caricatures. And too often in real life people assume there’s a one size fits all pattern to us as well as how to handle us. There isn’t. At one point in the book, Christian realizes that his brother’s experience is not his experience. By leaving, Christian changed the household dynamic. He has no idea what the experience might have been like because he wasn’t there, even if he knew Jace had been abused using the same methods.

One other way that books about abuse can fall down is where the point is obviously to teach readers how they can help by having a caring and persevering teacher/social worker break through the kid’s shell. It’s a version of the Freedom Writers for a different social problem. When it’s a social worker’s story, you know either the kid’s gonna make it, or the social worker’s life will be enriched by the whole experience as he moves on to his next challenge. Split is not a social worker’s story. It’s doesn’t condescend that way. As a story about the kids, it becomes unpredictable and very real.

After reading my review over a few times, I realized something I forgot to write about. I mention that I forgot because it’s indicative of my history, and illustrates one of the reasons why I believe that reviewing really can’t ever be objective. I’ve been writing mostly about getting abuse right and wrong. That’s not the only way to look at the novel though, but in retrospect it’s what my head spins around. It’s also very much about the complex relationship between the brothers. Neither of them change on their own. And neither do they fall in together as soldiers fighting a common enemy. They love each other. They scared each other. And they need each other. Christian feels duty bound to help Jace when he shows up on his doorstep. But he doesn’t want to throw himself into it. Jace disrupts his strategy of burying his past. Occasionally the text moves away from the pair, but Ms. Avasthi brings it back quickly (and sometimes forcefully) every time.

There are two things about the book that I have mixed feelings on. They aren’t drawbacks exactly, but they make me think about things somewhat differently. As they both involve spoilers, I’m going to put them on page 2 (as well as something I really liked about the ending).

Split covers the most important part of child abuse aside from stopping them in the first place, what happens afterward, an under-explored part of the picture. It does so with believable plot and flawed characters I liked. The narrative and author obviously care about kids in these situations, making for fine story.


A few other blogged reviews:

Title: Split
Author: Swati Avasthi
Cover creator: The Heads of State
Imprint / publisher: Alfred A. Knopf / Random House
Format: Hardcover
Length: 282 p.
Publication date: March 2010
ISBN-13: 978-0-375-86340-0

Categories: Book Reviews.

Tags: , , ,

Tor.com Story Podcast March – May 2010

It seems the Tor.com Story Podcast has been cancelled. Producer Mur Lafferty took over Escape Pod in early May, and simultaneously the Tor.com Story Podcast went silent. I did notice that many of the Tor.com stories have a listen download, where the authors read their stories. I think Tor.com was using that to make the podcasts. So the audio is still there, just not being podcast. Anyhow, if it’s not coming through via podcast, I ain’t getting it. Using a podcatcher is so much easier than downloading individually.

In my walks around Green Lake last week, I caught up on all the podcasts from Tor.com. So here’s my thoughts.

The Final Now by Gregory Benford

Episode 12 contains Gregory Benford‘s The Final Now. All I can say is ugh. Hate this kind of meta-story.

Eros, Philia, Agape by Rachel Swirsky

Episode 13 has Eros, Philia, Agape by Rachel Swirsky, narrated by the author. Pretty good story about loving a robot. It’s not so much the love thing that made this interesting, though that’s the bulk of the story. It’s that the robot has truly strange motivations that regular people just won’t get. It made the Hugo final ballot, and deservedly so I think.

The Next Invasion by Robert Reed

Episode 14 has The Next Invasion from Robert Reed, narrated by the author (I believe). A decent but average story that kind of explores the idea of but what if the aliens are already here!

Errata by Jeff VanderMeer

Episode 15 contains Errata from Jeff VanderMeer, again narrated by the author I think. I don’t really remember exactly what VanderMeer sounds like, so I could be wrong. I do not get this story at all. I listened to it twice even. Self-referential slipstream like stuff. Alternate reality Jeff VanderMeer goes to Lake Baikal to write a story. Also contains a penguin and an assassin. Sometimes I love experimental. Normally though, including this time, I just don’t get it.

Escape to Other Worlds with Science Fiction by Jo Walton

Episode 16 had Jo Walton‘s Escape to Other Worlds with Science Fiction, narrated by Charles Stross. Walton’s created an alternate history for her Small Change series where the Nazis did significantly better than they did in real life. I forget what the point was where that history diverged from ours. I’ve only read Farthing and I have to say I don’t remember it too well. This short story is set in the United States instead of Britain, in the same universe. The United States is somewhat fascist too, from what I can tell. A woman faces a temptation to denounce her employers as closet Jews. Other events happen to show that it could have happened here. And it could have. Interspersed with news headlines, from which the story gets its title. Liked the story. Won’t re-read it.

The Film-makers of Mars by Geoff Ryman

On to Episode 17 with Geoff Ryman’s The Film-makers of Mars. Vampires meet Edgar Rice Burroughs’ Barsoom series. Very well written, but pretty gimmicky.

First Flight by Mary Robinette Kowal

Episode 18 has the first story I’ve ever read by Mary Robinette Kowal, First Flight. Time travel story that doesn’t add much to the time travel trope, but it is quite well written from the character perspective. Louise is a time traveler because she’s old; time travel only works as far back as a person has been alive. Louise is old enough to have been alive before the Wright brothers first flew. And the time travel company’s investors want to get footage of that historic event. One of the few stories I’ve read with a particularly aged heroine. Recommended.

Four Horsemen, at Their Leisure by Richard Parks

Episode 19 contains Richard ParksFour Horsemen, at Their Leisure, narrated by Mur Lafferty. Definitely not my kind of story. Much like Gregory Benford’s The Final Now, this is also an end-times philosophic bent story. In other words, navel gazing thoughts about the nature of reality. Bleah.

Firstborn by Brandon Sanderson

Episode 20 appears to be the last Tor.com Story Podcast, for the moment at least, and it contains Firstborn by Brandon Sanderson. This is a fairly long old-school style space opera short story. Dennison Crestmar is the son of a high-ranking naval guy, and the 20 years younger brother of Varion Crestmar. Varion’s been off subduing the provinces for decades as a military commander that never loses. Dennison is expected to be like his brother, but doesn’t have the skill. He loses all the time. The ending is absolute crap though.


Obviously, I didn’t have a lot to say about most of these. I thought most of the podcasts were pretty uninspiring. Having listened to a few Mur Lafferty-produced Escape Pod episodes, I think they are much better work than these done for Tor.com. The story selection was limited to ones that had already appeared on Tor.com, so I can’t really fault her for that. But her chit-chat on Escape Pod is much more engaging than anything she did on Tor.com. And the audio quality of the narration for this podcast was generally sub-par. Authors aren’t always the best choices for reading their own work. Plus, in more than a few cases, someone should have edited the flubs out. If the Tor.com Story Podcast comes back from hiatus, I will probably only check it out to see if the production has improved.

Categories: Short Fiction Reviews.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,